“A bridge too far.” Experts weigh in on ‘Thy’
When the Australian Commercial Radio Awards return in 2026, will there be a new category for best AI presenter?
In posing this question, media analyst and Unmade founder Tim Burrowes makes an interesting and valid point.
As the fallout continues over ‘Thy,’ ARN’s AI-generated radio host, Burrowes says “Thy does feel like a landmark moment. It is, as far as we know, the first time it’s occurred in Australian radio.”
Experts continue to weigh in on the ethical ramifications, but one glaringly obvious question remains: Thy has been on-air at CADA for six months. So why are we only finding out about it now?
Tech journalist Stephen Fenech believes listeners are owed an explanation.
Speaking on Nine, Fenech says “I think it’s on ARN to be a bit more transparent about that whole thing … so listeners are aware that who they are listening to isn’t actually real.”
“When you talk about journalism, there are ethics that we need to stick to. You need to be fair and balanced.”
“I think only a human can produce that at this point.”
“AI is maybe OK to augment your job and help you with your research or structuring or (with) ideas, but to actually do the job in your place, in the media, I think that’s a bridge too far.”
As Fenech notes, AI technology has got to the point now where it’s very difficult to tell what’s fake and what’s real.
“I think the government needs to step in and have some guidelines and guard rails on AI and how it can be used responsibly, but also – in the case of many industries – where it doesn’t cost people their livelihood.”

Two years ago, when it first launched, Disrupt Radio introduced us to Debbie Disrupt, its AI newsreader.
The difference here, of course, is that Disrupt disclosed right from the outset that Debbie wasn’t a real person.
CEO Benjamin Roberts revealed at the time that there were some initial hiccups – such as when Debbie insisted on pronouncing Melbourne as ‘Mel-born.’
“We can now proudly say she can pronounce Woolloomooloo flawlessly,” Roberts told Radio Today shortly after launch. “If that’s not a sign of progress, we don’t know what is!”
Where does the industry go from here?
“It’s quite easy – as ARN demonstrated – to have this sort of technology to actually replace a person behind the microphone,” says Fenech.
“But you don’t want that to come at the expense of jobs.”
Is Tim Burrows taking the piss, or is he actually being serious?
Re the six months aspect I think it’s probably related to poor listenership of CADA more than anything else
The Simpsons did it first.
SCA have been using AI for weekend weather for over 12 months.
Where is the outcry? Quick! Get the pitch forks, light up the stakes and let’s march around there. How outrageous technology has advanced! Does Taylor Swift know we haven’t been playing CD’s for many years?
Get on the future train before it gets on you!
I’d be an early adopter and still have a voice in the future before you end up a bitter keyboard warrior on the redundancy list.
No matter how hard you complain, you won’t stop this.
Edge / Cada has always rated well but it’s only surveyed on DAB+ where it’s normally #1 (in Sydney). It is a Western suburbs licenced station (transmitter is in Wentworth Falls) and as such does not get into the Metro survey.
As for Thy .. Edge / Cada has always got along with a staff of about 4 all up. It is an extreme low-budget station so it’s purely about do you want an announcer for free or none at all.
Metro radio is all about big budget breakfast / Drive shows. No one really cares outside those areas. AI cannot replace those big personality shows (eg Kyle + Jacqui ) but will certainly replace the announcers on music shifts.
An article in the 24-04-2025 edition of the SMH mentions that the AI-generated presenter has been operational since November 2024.
https://www.smh.com.au/culture/tv-and-radio/thy-has-been-on-the-radio-for-six-months-turns-out-she-isn-t-real-20250424-p5ltxi.html
As indicated in the article, “she” has an audience of 72000 and listeners have not noticed that the presenter was fake.
It was legal and there was no obligation to disclose this to the audience.
There have been discussions on this site about AI-generated presenters.
Issues discussed included inappropriate or unacceptable commentary.
However while an AI DJ may work it may be difficult to have talk back and commentary and well as spontaneous commentary of a sports match.
Not impossible but may be forthcoming with AI identification of players and actions.
Thanks